Home Your basket
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparison of three diffe...
   Price 12.00 €
• Anatomy of the external a...
   Price 14.00 €
• Middle ear overpressure w...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subcutaneous emphysema an...
   Price 5.50 €
• The cholesteatomatous rin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cochlear implants in chil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unsteadiness and drunkenn...
   Price 10.50 €
• "Sonorous man" - an appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• The velum: 5th tap of spe...
   Price 14.00 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Efficacy of nasal irrigat...
   Price 15.00 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parapharyngeal tumours: M...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• BAHA in single sided deaf...
   Price 12.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Validation of a self asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Extraction of the esophag...
   Price 8.50 €
• Postural study on healthy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Antro choanal polyp in ch...
   Price 10.00 €
• Central and peripherical ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• Papillary thyroid carcino...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 306.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2005 o

PHONIATRICS

Proposition of adaptation of the voice handicap index for the singing voice


Authors : D. Morsomme, Ch. Simon, J. Jamart, M. Remacle, I. Verduyckt (Bruxelles)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,5:305-313.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: The voice handicap index by Jacobson et al doesn’t render the difficulties experienced by singers. The aim of this study is to adapt the V.H.I. to the singing voice and evaluate it’s reliability and coherence. In order to obtain this first scale, we went through three stages. Material et method: The first consisted in the modification of the existing items and the creation of new ones. The second was to measure the stability by a test – retest and the coherence of the adapted and the new items. This was done on groups of dysodic singers and professional voice users. The third stage consisted in evaluating the reliability and the coherence of 31 items on a homogeneous population of 132 classical singers with and without vocal impairment. The subjects were divided in three groups. The first group was composed of 95 normophonic singers, the second included 37 dysphonic singers and the third group was the control group, composed of 20 non singers without vocal complaints. Results: The statistical results show a good stability of the test – retest (ICC=0.949; Rho: 0.912; Bland et Altman [-010.19, +13.23]). The internal coherence of each sub scale (Cronbach’s alpha) is good (>0.70). The correlations between the three sub scales are moderate between the functional and the emotional sub scale: 0.58; between the emotional and the physical: 0.64; and between the functional and the physical: 0.78). Each sub scale is measuring a specific dimension; still they are homogeneous between one another. Four variables have a significative influence on the results: the pathology (p<0.001), being a professional singer (p<0.001), the repetition (p=0.003), being a chorister (p=0.002). Conclusion: The V.H.I. adapted to the singers, appears to be reliable, valid and adapted to the population of dysodic classical singers.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE